<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Joseph C. Gallo's Musings and Perspectives - Latest Comments</title><link>http://josephcgallo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://josephcgallo.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:52:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Four Steps that Most People Take in Grasping Twitter [Infographic]</title><link>http://josephcgallo.com/2012/06/06/the-four-steps-to-getting-twitter/#comment-548921145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty squarely in Stage 4.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ricky Cadden</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Save Noah! (aka Prevent the Commoditization of Social Media)</title><link>http://josephcgallo.com/2012/01/04/save-noah-aka-prevent-the-commoditization-of-social-media-2/#comment-411087905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The formula for how PhoneDog came up with that dollar figure is unknown - but it seems all followers (real people, bots, etc) are priced the same. IMO this is the precedent that could lead to more cases by employers whose employees are using social media for the good of the company.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jgallo02</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:52:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Save Noah! (aka Prevent the Commoditization of Social Media)</title><link>http://josephcgallo.com/2012/01/04/save-noah-aka-prevent-the-commoditization-of-social-media-2/#comment-400603363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this particular case is interesting, but I'm very interested to know how PhoneDog came up with that price? Are all followers equal? What about the ones who log into twitter once a week vs those who respond and retweet every hour?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This brings up a lot of social network questions too, but I'll save that for another day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zacharyc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:40:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Bad Apples&amp;#8230; (The Ocean Marketing Fiasco)</title><link>http://josephcgallo.com/2011/12/29/a-few-bad-apples-the-ocean-marketing-fiasco/#comment-398293971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Randall. Appreciate it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jgallo02</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 11:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Bad Apples&amp;#8230; (The Ocean Marketing Fiasco)</title><link>http://josephcgallo.com/2011/12/29/a-few-bad-apples-the-ocean-marketing-fiasco/#comment-398169396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;beautifully said, Joe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">texrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 23:48:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>